Topic 1. Introduction to One-Step Model
Topic 2. Example of a One-Step Model
Topic 3. Risk-Neutral Valuation
Topic 4. Risk-Neutral Valuation Example
Topic 5. Using Delta to Develop a Replicating Portfolio
Assumes stock can move to only two prices over one time period:
Up state:
Down state:
Example Input:
50Δ50\Delta
Based on no-arbitrage and law of one price
Law of one price: If two investments provide the same cash flows at
the same times in the future, they both should sell for exactly the same price.
Investors assume risk-neutral valuation:
Expected return = risk-free rate
Given:
Q1. Suppose a 1-year European call option exists on XYZ stock. The current continuously compounded risk-free rate is 3% and XYZ does not pay a dividend. Assume an annual standard deviation of 8%.
The risk-neutral probability of an up move for the XYZ call option is:
A. 0.31.
B. 0.69.
C. 0.92.
D. 1.08.
Explanation: B is correct.
First, calculate the size of the up- and down-move factors:
The risk-neutral probability of an up move is then calculated as:
Hedging: Eliminating price variation by short selling an asset with same price volatility as the asset being hedged.
Hedge Ratio: Number of asset units needed to completely eliminate the price volatility of one call option.
Delta ( ) = Sensitivity of option value to stock movement
Formula:
Replicating portfolio:
Long shares, short 1 option → hedge risk
Q2. An investor is analyzing a 1-year European call option with an exercise price of $18. The stock value in the up state is $30, while the value in the down state is $10. The delta for this option is closest to:
A. 0.40.
B. 0.60.
C. 0.67.
D. 0.90.
Explanation: B is correct.
Delta provides the number of units of stock to hold per call option to be shorted to implement a hedge. If the stock price goes up to $30, the call option with an exercise price of $18 will be worth $12. If the stock price goes down to $0, the call option will be worth $0.
Topic 1. Introduction to Two-Step Model
Topic 2. Modifying the Binomial Model
Topic 3. American Options
Topic 4. Increasing the Number of Time Periods
Extends tree by adding second time step
More realistic: allows more outcomes
Terminal node payoffs computed first
Value is back-calculated using risk-neutral probabilities
Key formula:
Same stock:
Q3. Assume the stock price is currently $80, the stock price annual up-move factor is 1.15, and the riskfree rate is 3.9%. The value of a 2-year European call option with an exercise price of $62 using a
two-step binomial model is closest to:
A. $0.00.
B. $18.00.
C. $23.07.
D. $24.92.
Explanation: C is correct.
Q4. Assume the stock price is currently $80, the stock price annual up-move factor is 1.15, and the riskfree rate is 3.9%. The value of a 2-year European put option with an exercise price of $62 using a
two-step binomial model is closest to:
A. $0.42.
B. $16.89.
C. $18.65.
D. $21.05.
Explanation: A is correct. Using put-call parity
The binomial model is adaptable to different underlying assets by modifying the risk-neutral probability formula:
Q5. A 1-year American put option with an exercise price of $50 will be worth either $8 at maturity with a probability of 0.45 or $0 with a probability of 0.55. The current stock price is $45. The risk-free
rate is 3%. The optimal strategy is to:
A. exercise the option because the payoff from exercise exceeds the present value of the expected future payoff.
B. not exercise the option because the payoff from exercise is less than the discounted present value of the future payoff.
C. exercise the option because it is currently in the money.
D. not exercise the option because it is currently out of the money.
Explanation: A is correct.
The payoff from exercising the option is the exercise price minus the current stock price: $50 – $45 = $5. The discounted value of the expected future payoff is:
It is optimal to exercise the option early because it is worth more exercised ($5.00) than if not exercised ($3.49).
Q6. The annual standard deviation for Baker stock is 11%. The continuously compounded risk-free rate is 3.5% per year, and Baker pays dividends at a yield of 2%. The risk-neutral probability of a
downward move is closest to:
A. 0.366.
B. 0.459.
C. 0.541.
D. 0.634
Explanation: B is correct.
There are several steps needed for this calculation. The first is to calculate U (the size of the up-move factor), which is equal to Therefore, D (the size of the down-move factor) is 1/ 1.116278, or 0.895834. Next, the risk-neutral probability of an upward move is calculated as:
Finally, the risk-neutral probability of a downward move is calculated as:
More time steps = finer approximation of continuous price paths.
As step size Δt→0\Delta t \to 0 , binomial model converges to the Black-Scholes-Merton (BSM) model.
Increased steps → more nodes → better realism in pricing
Allows better modeling of:
Path-dependency
Early exercise (American options)
limΔt→0Binomial Value=BSM Value\lim_{\Delta t \to 0} \text{Binomial Value} = \text{BSM Value}
Q7. Using a binomial model, the price of a call option is equal to $3.46. For the same option, the Black- Scholes-Merton model produces a price of $3.38. If the time intervals used in the binomial model are shortened, the expectation is that:
A. $3.38 will get closer to $3.46.
B. $3.46 will get closer to $3.38.
C. the price for both models will be approximately $3.42.
D. there will be no change in the gap between prices.
Explanation: B is correct.
As time intervals are shortened, the price produced by the binomial model will converge toward the Black-Scholes-Merton model price. In this case, the $3.46 price will get lower until it eventually lands at $3.38.