Topic 1. Probability Matrix
Topic 2. Marginal and Conditional Distributions
Q1. Suppose a hedge fund manager expects a stock to have three possible returns (–6%, 0%,6%) following negative, neutral, or positive changes in analyst ratings, respectively. The fund manager constructs the following bivariate probability matrix for the stock.
What is the marginal probability that the stock has a positive analyst rating?
A. 10%.
B. 15%.
C. 25%.
D. 30%.
Explanation: D is correct.
The marginal distribution for a positive analyst rating is computed by summing the third row consisting of all possible outcomes of a positive rating as follows:
Q2. Suppose a hedge fund manager expects a stock to have three possible returns (–6%, 0%,6%) following negative, neutral, or positive changes in analyst ratings, respectively. The fund manager constructs the following bivariate probability matrix for the stock.
What are the conditional probabilities of the three monthly stock returns given that the analyst rating is positive?
Explanation: A is correct.
A conditional distribution is defined based on the conditional probability for a
bivariate random variable given . All possible outcomes of a positive analyst
rating are found in the third row of the bivariate probability matrix ( ) as
0%, 5%, and 25% for monthly returns of –6%, 0%, and 6%, respectively. These
joint probabilities are then divided by the marginal probability of a positive
analyst rating, which is computed as 0% + 5% + 25% = 30%. Thus, the conditional
distribution for is computed as 0% / 30%, 5% / 30%, and 25% / 30% and
summarized as follows:
Topic 1. Expectation of a Bivariate Random Function
Topic 2. Covariance and Correlation Between Random Variables
Topic 3. Relationship Between Covariance and Correlation
Q3. What is the expectation of the function using the following joint PMF?
A. 226.4.
B. 358.9.
C. 394.7.
D. 413.6.
Explanation: D is correct.
The expectation is computed as follows:
However, a correlation of 0 does not necessarily imply independence.
Q4. A hedge fund manager computed the covariances between two bivariate random variables. However, she is having difficulty interpreting the implications of the dependency between the two variables as the scale of the two variables are very different. Which of the following statements will most likely benefit the fund manager when interpreting the dependency for these two bivariate random variables?
A. Compute the correlation by multiplying the covariance of the two variables by the product of the two variables’ standard deviations.
B. Disregard the covariance for bivariate random variables as this data is not
relevant due to the nature of bivariate random variables.
C. Compute the correlation by dividing the covariance of the two variables by the product of the two variables’ standard deviations.
D. Divide the larger scale variables by a common denominator and rerun the estimations of covariance by subtracting each variable’s expected mean.
Explanation: C is correct.
Correlation will standardize the data and remove the difficulty in interpreting the scale difference between variables. Correlation is determined by dividing the covariance of the two variables by the product to the two variables’ standard deviations. The formula for correlation is as follows:
Topic 1. Linear Transformations
Topic 2. Variance of Weighted Sum of Bivariate Random Variables
Topic 3. Impact of Correlation on the Standard Deviation
Topic 4. Conditional Expectations
The minimum variance portfolio (i.e., optimal risk weight) is:
Q5. What is the variance of a two-asset portfolio given the following covariance matrix and a correlation between the two assets of 0.25? Assume the weights in Asset 1 and Asset 2 are 40% and 60%, respectively.
A. 0.27%.
B. 0.79%.
C. 1.47%.
D. 2.63%.
Explanation: A is correct.
The variance of this two-asset portfolio is computed as:
X2=x2X_2 = x_2X1X_1
Helps in scenario analysis: estimating expected return if a certain event occurs.
Used in Bayesian modeling, stress testing, and regime switching models.
Q6. Suppose a portfolio manager creates a conditional PMF based on analyst ratings, X2. Analysts’ ratings can take on three possible outcomes: an upgrade, X2 =1; a downgrade, X2 = –1; or a neutral no change rating, X2 =0. What is the conditional expectation of a return given an analyst upgrade and the following conditional distribution for
A. 2.06%.
B. 3.05%.
C. 4.40%.
D. 11.72%.
Explanation: A is correct.
The conditional expectation of the return given a positive analyst upgrade is computed as:
Topic 1. Independent and Identically Distributed (i.i.d.) Random Variables
Q7. Which of the following statements regarding the sums of i.i.d. normal random variables is incorrect?
A. The sums of i.i.d. normal random variables are normally distributed.
B. The expected value of a sum of three i.i.d. random variables is equal to 3μ.
C. The variance of the sum of four i.i.d. random variables is equal to
D. The variance of the sum of i.i.d. random variables grows linearly.
Explanation: C is correct.
The variance of the sum of n i.i.d. random variables is equal to n . Thus, for four i.i.d. random variables, the sum of the variance would be equal to 4 . The covariance terms are all equal to zero because all variables are independent.
Q8. The variance of the average of multiple i.i.d. random variables:
A. increases as n increases.
B. decreases as n increases.
C. increases if the covariance is negative as n increases.
D. decreases if the covariance is negative as n increases.
Explanation: B is correct.
The variance of the average of multiple i.i.d. random variables decreases as n increases. The covariance of i.i.d. random variables is always zero.